We've gotten a good amount of feedback on our “Escape Room Strategy” series, frankly it proves our theory that smart leaders are using escape
rooms for more than just a fun team outing. One common theme in the feedback is a question around the need for leadership, specifically is there a style of leadership that enhances the performance of the team? Based on the hundreds of teams we’ve observed we can confirm there is a style and it should surprise no one that it closely mirrors successful business leadership. Compare how these leadership styles match what you’ve experienced at work.
To keep this article from becoming a leadership tome I'm breaking the discussion into four leadership types, from worst to best performing.
It will surprise no one that the worst performing team in an escape room is a team where no one takes on the leader function or the leader is weak. In this scenario the team either succeeds or fails based on individual talents and random luck of discovery. Teams tend to fall into group think and stay blocked when they hit a significant challenge. It's rough to watch as teams like this struggle.
Execution Based Leadership
It’s common to see one or possibly two people on the team step into an authoritative role. Interestingly it’s not always the person with the highest title, rather usually someone passionate about “beating the best time”, competitive and a strong personality. In this mode, the leader will set the goals, orchestrate most activities, call timeout when the team is stuck, act as the central locus of information, and motivate folks when needed. In the escape room as in business, this model works but is highly dependent on the leader’s skills, her/his ability to forego mistakes, and team's willingness to buy in to their leadership.
Situational and Servant Model Leadership
Typically without any overt discussion someone will step into the leadership role when the time is correct. Depending on the situation they will praise, strategize, and motivate the team. While this list isn’t comprehensive here are some examples:
- Ensure everyone is on the same page without making anyone feel inadequate. This is usually done via strategic questions vs direct statements. This increases buy-in from the team
- Exemplify high standards, ethics, and setting a model for everyone
- While solving puzzles they will monitor team members for engagement or possible issues
- Usually the first person to praise individual accomplishments and celebrate team successes, they enjoy seeing their team succeed above the pride of their own accomplishments
- They do not directly point out failures rather they ask indirect questions to get back on track
- Watching the team for progress and course correcting at strategic moments
- Empower team members to “run with it” when they have a good idea or success
- Talk about their own mistakes first before anyone else’s
No lead necessary – while the previous leadership type does show the best results we would be deficient if we didn’t list one last type. Occasionally ( 1 in ~30) we see a team that has gone through the forming–storming-norming-performing (see link here) steps of team development. The lead has done some masterful work building the team into a highly skilled machine. These teams work together incredibly well, playing to each other’s strengths, calling in help when needed, drawing energy from each other, and enjoying each other. No leader is required and it’s a beautiful sequence to watch.